Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® °íÁ¤Ã¼¿Í Áö´ë³ª»ç°£ÀÇ ºÎ½ÄƯ¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

CORROSION CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN IMPLANT FIXTURE AND ABUTMENT SCREW

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2000³â 38±Ç 1È£ p.85 ~ 97
±â¼öÁø, ±ÇÇõ½Å, ÃÖÇÑö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±â¼öÁø ( Kee Su-Jin ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±ÇÇõ½Å ( Kweon Hyeog-Sin ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÃÖÇÑö ( Choe Han-Cheol ) - ±¤¾ç´ëÇб³ Á¦Ã¶±Ý¼ÓÇаú

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to compare the corrosion characteristics between implant fixture and two types of abutment screw; gold screw, titanium screw. The anodic polarization behavior, the galvanic corrosion behavior, and the crevice corrosion behavior of prepared samples were investigated using potentiostat and scanning electron microscope. The results were as follows : 1. Anodic polarization behavior of samples: The primary passivation potential of implant fixture was -420mV, implant abutment was -560mV, titanium screw was -370mV and gold screw was -230mV. All samples were shown to have a high corrosion potential and good formation of passive film. The critical passive current density of gold screw was higher than of other samples and the sample of gold screw showed a unstable passive film formation at passive region. 2. Galvanic corrosion behavior of samples: Contact current density between implant fixture and titanium screw showed 8.023x 10-5C/cm2. Contact current density between implant fixture and gold screw showed 5.142x 10-5C/cm2. 3. Crevice corrosion behavior of samples : The crevice corrosion resistance of sample using titanium screw was higher than that of sample using gold screw, and a severe corrosion morphologies were observed at the fixture-screw interface by the scanning electron microscope.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed